A reasoning companion to Technology and the Making of the Modern World (IE Humanities, Patrick De Oliveira). The course's premise, after Walter Benjamin and Langdon Winner, is that technologies are not neutral forces of progress but human creations that reorganize how power is distributed across society — a site of contestation, not a verdict of history. These ten widgets let you manipulate that argument: test claims, weigh interpretive frames, trace who wins and loses, and read the long arc from the Lowell mills to the digital age. Built by hand, no AI text generation, in keeping with the course's policy.
1. Do artifacts have politics?
Langdon Winner distinguishes two ways technologies carry politics: (a) a specific design settles a dispute (a choice that could have gone otherwise), and (b) a technology is inherently political — it demands a particular kind of power to work at all. Read each case and sort it. Feedback explains Winner's reading.
—
Pick the reading that best fits Winner's argument.
2. Determinism vs. social construction
Does technology drive history, or does society drive technology? Slide between the two poles and watch how the same event — the mechanical clock, the railroad, the bomb — gets narrated. The course argues the truth lies in the contested middle: technology as "a site of negotiation," not a cause that "determines the course of history."
3. Anatomy of a scholarly argument
Strong historical writing layers a claim on grounds (evidence) via a warrant (the assumption linking them), shored up by backing and tested against a rebuttal (Toulmin's model). Pick a thesis from the course and reveal each layer; toggle a part off to feel the argument weaken.
4. Periodizing the modern world
The course marches chronologically from the late 1700s to the early 2000s, following Misa's Leonardo to the Internet. Drag the lens across the timeline to read each era's driving technologies, the social order they reshaped, and the matching course session.
5. Who gains, who loses?
If technology "reorganizes how power gets distributed across society," every innovation has winners and losers. Pick a technology and adjust how its benefits and burdens fall across four groups; the bars show the redistribution and a Gini-style spread of the outcome.
6. The factory clock — Lowell mills
Before the factory, work followed the task and the sun; the mill bell imposed clock-time. Set the working day and the loom's speed to see how the factory system converted a person's hours into output and a wage — and how little of the surplus returned to the "mill girls." Grounded in the Lowell sources (Sessions 3–4).
Historical Lowell day ≈ 12–14 h; worker kept a thin slice of the value.
7. Tools of empire
Steamships, railways, the telegraph, quinine and repeating rifles did not just accompany nineteenth-century imperial conquest — they made its scale possible (Headrick; Sessions 6–9). Toggle each technology and watch the imperial reach, speed of control, and asymmetry of force respond.
8. Reading sources critically
Each week pairs primary sources (made in the period) with a scholarly source (analysis after the fact). Sorting them — and spotting each one's bias and silences — is the core skill of the course. Classify the excerpt, then check what the source can and cannot tell you.
—
Decide whether this was produced inside the period or written about it later.
9. Civilization & barbarism — Benjamin's dialectic
"There is no document of civilization which is not at the same time a document of barbarism." Walter Benjamin refuses the progress-only story. Weigh a technology's celebrated achievements against its hidden costs; the scale tilts to show that the two are not separable but bound together.
10. Spotting the determinist fallacy
Popular writing about technology is full of seductive shortcuts: the gadget that "inevitably" caused an outcome, the lone-genius myth, "the tech is just neutral." Read each claim and name the flaw the course trains you to resist.
—
Name the rhetorical move that obscures technology's politics.